Can the image be an argument?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2016.2.21445Keywords:
Visual Rhetoric, Argumentation Theory, CommunicationAbstract
In societies like ours with a strong visual culture, it is urgent to question the legitimacy of extending the classical and rational notion of “argument”, to nonlinguistic or non-discursive fields, as is the case of visual phenomena. Contributing to the lusophone debate about the argumentative potential of images, this article argues that although not all images have an argumentative form, it does not necessarily leads us to assume that no argument can be presented in a visual form. Admitting the verbalist perspective on visual arguments, according to which visual arguments have a discursive nature, the paper stresses the importance of visual propositions to the reason-giving process that characterizes argumentation. The analysis of a cartoon and the isolation of its visual propositions provides the opportunity to demonstrate how, in everyday life, we can observe how a visual argument works.Downloads
References
BARCELÓ ASPEITIA, A.A. Words and images in argumentation. Argumentation, 26, 355-368, 2012.
BIRDSELL, D. & GROARKE, L. Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, v. 33, p. 1-10, 1996.
BIRDSELL, D.S., and L. GROARKE. Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, v. 43, p. 103–113, 2007.
BLAIR, A. J. (2012a). The possibility and actuality of visual arguments. In: J.A. Blair, Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation, p. 205-223, Ch. 16. Amsterdam: Springer Publications. Originally published in Argumentation and Advocacy, v. 33, p. 23-39, 1996.
BLAIR, A.J. (20(20012b). The rhetoric of visual arguments. In: J. A. Blair. Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation, p. 261-279, ch. 19. Amsterdam: Springer Publications. Originally published in C.A. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining Visual Rhetorics, p. 41-62. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
EHNINGER, Doulgas. Contemporary Rhetoric: a reader’s coursebook. Glenview: Scott Foresman, 1972.
FLEMING, D. Can pictures be arguments?. Argumentation and Advocacy, v. 33, p. 11-22, 1996.
FOSS SK, FOSS K, TRAPP R. (eds.) Contemporary Perspectives on Rethoric, Propect Heights: Waveland Press, 1985.
FOSS, SK. Framing the study of visual rhetoric: Toward a transformation of rhetorical theory. In: HILL, C.A., HELMERS, M. (Editors), Defining visual rhetorics, London: Routledge, p. 303-313, 2004.
GOODMAN, N. Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis. Hackett, 1978.
GROARKE, L. Beyond words. Two dogmas of informal logic. In: H. V. Hansen & R. C. Pinto (Eds.), Reason Reclaimed: Essays in Honor of J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson, p. 135-
, Newport News: Vale Press, 2007.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1991.
JOHNSON, R. H. Why “visual arguments” aren’t arguments. In: INFORMAL LOGIC AT 25, 2003, Windsor, ON. Proceedings... Windsor: University of Winsor, CD-ROM, p.1-13, 2003.
_____; BLAIR, J. A. Informal logic: An overview. Informal Logic. v. 20, n. 2, p. 93–107, 2000.
KJELDSEN, J. The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation. Argumentation. V. 29, n. 2, p. 115-132, 2015.
KRESS, G. R.; van LEEUWEN, T. Reading Images: the grammar of graphic design. London: Routledge, 1996.
MATOS, Rodrigo. Futesmola. Jornal Expresso, 25 nov. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.publico.pt/culturaipsilon/noticia/cartoonista-rodrigo-de-matos-venceugrande-premio-press-cartoon-europe-1623649
Acesso em: 30 jul. 2015.
PERELMAN, C. OLBRECHST-TYTECA, L. Tratado da Argumentação, Lisboa: Edições Piaget, 2000.
REBOUL, O. Introdução à Retórica. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1998.
Roque G. Visual Argumentation. A Reappraisal. ISSA Proceedings, 2010.
SCHWED, M. Visual objects as part of a rational communication process. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE ONTARIO SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF ARGUMENTATION (OSSA), 2007: Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground,
Winsor, ON. Proceedings... HANSEN, H. V. e outros. Windor, ON: University of Winsor, CD-ROM , p. 1–10, 2007.
TSERONIS, A. Argumentative functions of visuals: beyond claiming and justifying. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE ONTARIO SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF ARGUMENTATION (OSSA), 2010: virtues of argumentation: Proceedings ... Windor, ON: University of Winsor, p. 22-26, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Derechos de Autor
La sumisión de originales para la Revista Famecos implica la transferencia, por los autores, de los derechos de publicación. El copyright de los artículos de esta revista es el autor, junto con los derechos de la revista a la primera publicación. Los autores sólo podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicaciones indicando claramente a Revista Famecos como el medio de la publicación original.
Creative Commons License
Excepto donde especificado de modo diferente, se aplican a la materia publicada en este periódico los términos de una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, que permite el uso irrestricto, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio siempre y cuando la publicación original sea correctamente citada.
