RELATIONAL CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE: RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HEALTH OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2001.1.34987Palavras-chave:
Justiça. Responsabilidade. Equidade.Resumo
Numa sociedade democrática, as regras sociais são impostas a cada um por todos. Como “recebedores” de tais regras, tendemos a pensar que elas deviam ser designadas para engendrar a melhor distribuição possível de bens e males ou qualidade de vida. Enquanto autores das regras, tendemos a pensar que os malefícios por nós impostos através de tais regras têm maior peso moral que os danos que nós meramente deixamos de evitar ou mitigar. Embora as atuais teorias (consequencialistas e rawlsianas) sejam dominadas pela primeira perspectiva, uma concepção adequada da justiça exige um balanceamento de ambas tendências. O tema da equidade na saúde é bem apropriado para mostrar como concepções da justiça puramente dirigidas aos recebedores estão fadadas ao fracasso e como esboçar uma alternativa mais promissora.
Downloads
Referências
Ameson, Richard (1989) 'Equality and Equality of Opportunity for Welfare', Philosophical Studies, 56: 77-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00646210
Black, Douglas Sir, J. N. Morris, Cyril Smith, Peter Townsend (1990) “The Black Report, in Peter Townsend, Peter and Nick Davidson (eds.) Inequalities in Health. London: Penguin
Bok, Hilary (1996) “Acting Without Choosing', NOUS 30: 174-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2216292
Carens, Joseph (1987) 'Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders", Review of Politics, 49: 2591-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500033817
Cohen, G.A. (1989) “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice”, Ethics, 99: 906-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/293126
Cohen, G.A. (1992) “Incentives, Inequality, and Community, in Grethe Peterson (ed.) The Tanner Lectures on Human Values XI. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Cohen, G.A. (1997) Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice", in Philosophy and PublicAffairs, 26: 3-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00048.x
Cohen, G.A. (2000) If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're so Rich?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029668
University Press.
Daniels, Norman (1985) Just Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624971
Dreze, Jean, and Amartya Sen (1995) India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald (1981) 'What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare', Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10: 185-246.
Dworkin, Ronald (1981b) “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources”, Philosophy and Public
Affairs, 10: 283-345.
Dworkin, Ronald (1987) “What is Equality? Part 3: The Place of Liberty”, Iowa Law Review, 73: 1-54.
Dworkin, Ronald (2000) Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Elster, Jon, and Roemer, John (1991) (eds.) Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172387
Evans, Robert G., Morris L. Barer, Theodore R. Marmor (eds.) (1994) Why Are Some People Healthy and Others Not? The Determinants of Health of Populations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112421628
Galston, William (1980) Justice and the Human Good. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gauthier, David (1986) Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198249926.001.0001
Griffin, James (1986) Well-Being. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Gwatkin, D. R. (2000) 'Health Inequalities and the Health of the Poor: What Do We Know? What CanWe Do?”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78: 3:15. Also available at http://www who. int/bulletin/tableofcontents/2000/vol.78no. 1.html
Kagan, Shelly (1989) The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
