An activity theory analysis of learning in and for inter-school work

Authors

  • Harry Daniels University of Oxford

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1981-2582.2016.s.24319

Keywords:

Activity theory. Learning. Expansive learning

Abstract

In this article I will discuss activity theory. This highly influential body of writing is seen as a product of the reworking and extension of the original Vygotskian ideas on the social formation of mind by A.N. Leontiev (1978) and colleagues who had initially worked as part of Vygotsky’s group in Moscow and departed for a new setting with new theoretical emphases in Kharkov. At a very general level of description, activity theorists seek to analyse the development of consciousness within practical social activity. Their concern is with the psychological impacts of activity and the social conditions and systems which are produced in and through such activity. I will open this article by outlining some of the distinctions, fissures and cleavages that have formed in the field since the original early twentieth century body of work became widely available in the west. I will then provide a brief outline of the methodology developed by Engeström and his colleagues in Helsinki. I will conclude the article by outlining a number of issues which feature in current debates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Harry Daniels, University of Oxford

University: University of Oxford Occupation: Professor of Graduation, Master and Doctorate Degrees; Researcher Department: Director of The Centre for Sociocultural and Activity Theory Research (Bath) He also holds positions as: Adjunct Professor, Centre for Learning Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia; Research Professor, Centre for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University, Osaka, Japan.

References

BAKHTIN, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Michael Holquist and Caryl Emerson. University of Texas Press Slavic Series 1. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.

BAKHTIN, M. M. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson. Theory and History of Literature 8. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.

BAKHTIN, M. M. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Trans. Vern W. McGee. Ed. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. University of Texas Press Slavic Series 8. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986.

BATESON, G. Steps To An Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.

COLE, M. Cultural Psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.

DANIELS, H.; WARMINGTON, P. Analysing third generation activity systems: labour-power, subject position and personal transformation. Journal of Workplace Learning, v. 19, n. 6, p. 377-391. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620710777110

DANIELS, H.; LEADBETTER, J.; SOARES, A.; MCNAB, N. Learning in and for cross-school working. Oxford Review of Education, v. 33, n. 2, p. 125-142. 2007. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03054980701259469

DAVYDOV, V. V; RADZIKHOVSKII, L. A. Vygotsky's theory and the activity oriented approach in Psychology. In: WERTSCH, J. V. (ed.) Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. p. 35-36.

ENGESTRÖM, Y. Learning by expanding: An activitytheoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit, 1987. available online at: <http://lchc.ucsd. edu/MCA/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/toc.htm>. https://doi. org/10.1017/cbo9780511812774.025

ENGESTRÖM, Y. Innovative learning in work teams: analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In: Y. ENGESTRÖM, Y. et al. (Eds.). Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 377-404. https://doi. org/10.1080/001401300409143

ENGESTRÖM, Y. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, v. 43, n. 7, p. 960-974. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620410521477

ENGESTRÖM, Y. New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Journal of Workplace Learning, v. 16, n. 1/2, p. 11-21. 2004.

ENGESTRÖM, Y. Developmental Work Research: Expanding Activity Theory in Practice. Berlin: Lehmanns Media, 2005.

ENGESTRÖM, Y. Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. In: YAMAZUMI, K. (Ed.). Building activity theory in practice: Toward the next generation. Kansai: Kansai University Press, 2006. p. 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.015

ENGESTRÖM, Y. Putting Vygotsky to work. The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In: DANIELS, H.; COLE, M.; WERTSCH, J. V. (Eds.). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 363-382.

GLASSMAN, M. Understanding Vygotsky’s Motive and Goal: an Exploration of the Work of A. N. Leontiev. Human Development, 39, p. 309-327, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1159/ 000278505

HAKKARAINEN, P. Editor’s Introduction: Challenges of Activity Theory. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, v. 42, n. 2, p. 3-11. 2004.

HEGEL, G. W. F. (1807). The Phenomenology of Spirit. A. V. Miller (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

KOZULIN, A. A literary model for psychology. In: HICKS, D. (Ed.). Discourse, Learning, and Schooling. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996. p. 145-164. https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511720390.005

KOZULIN, A. Psychological Tools. A sociocultural approach to education. London: Harvard University Press, 1998.

LANGEMEYER, I. Contradictions in expansive learning: Towards a critical analysis of self-dependent forms of learning in relation to contemporary socio-technological change. [43 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Online Journal], v. 7, n. 1, Art. 12, 2005. Available at: <http://www.qualitative-research.net/1-06/06-1-12-e.htm> [09-28-2007].

LEONT’EV, A. N. Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1978.

LEONT’EV, A. N. The Concept of Activity in Psychology. In: WERTSCH, J. V. (ed.). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1981.

MÄRTSIN, M. From triangles to runaway-objects and mycorrhizae activities: an Overview of the Engeströmian version of activity theory Mimeograph. Centre for Sociocultural and Activity Theory: University of Bath, 2007.

MARX, K. (1883). Capital: a critique of political economy. London: Penguin, 1976. v. 1.

MIETTINEN, R.; PEISA, S. Integrating school-based learning with the study of change in working life: the alternative enterprise method. Journal of Education and Work, v. 15, n. 3, p. 303-319, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080220000 12076

ROTH, W. M. The ethico-moral nature of identity: prolegomena to the development of third-generation Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. International Journal of Educational Research, v. 46, p. 83-93. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer. 2007.07.008

ROTH, W. M.; LEE, Y. J. Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Review of Educational Research, v. 77, n. 2, p. 186-232. 2007. https://doi.org/10.3102/ 0034654306298273

VASILYUK, F. The psychology of experiencing: The resolution of life’s critical situations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester, 1991.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. Thinking and speech. In: VYGOTSKY, L. S. Collected works. R. Rieber & A Carton, eds. N Minick, trans. New York: Plenum, 1987. v. 1, p. 39-285.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. Imagination and Creativity in Childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, v. 42, n. 1, p. 7-97. 2004.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-31

How to Cite

Daniels, H. (2016). An activity theory analysis of learning in and for inter-school work. Educação, 39(4), s24-s31. https://doi.org/10.15448/1981-2582.2016.s.24319

Issue

Section

Dossier - Interdisciplinary Theoretical-methodological Insights on Intervention