Teacher’s attitudes
Revising factor structure and construct validity of the interaction with people with disabilities scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1981-2582.2024.1.45156Keywords:
inclusion, teachers, interaction-with-people-with-disabilities-scale, Angola, multivariate data analysis.Abstract
Teachers’ positive interactions with people with disabilities improve their awareness and advocacy for inclusion, which is an important policy and community goal worldwide. Therefore, to guide and shape inclusive efforts in Angola as well as to promote advances in research related to measurement of attitudes we conducted a study to analyzed the factor structure, validity, and reliability of the Interaction with People with Disability Scale (IDPS) for a sample of 1352 elementary teachers. Results of an exploratory factorial analysis showed a solution with factors of discomfort, coping, and vulnerability explaining 64.29% of the variance. A confirmatory factorial analysis suggested a model with good fit and convergent validity for discomfort and coping, and good evidence of discriminate validity for the three factors. We discussed and concluded with how this results and how exploring attitudes towards people with disabilities with the IDPS can be useful when promoting activities for teachers training in inclusive education.
Downloads
References
António, A., Mendes, G. M. L., & González, O. H. (2021). Políticas de educação especial numa perspectiva inclusiva em Angola: contexto, avanços e necessidades emergentes (1979-2017) [Special education policies in an inclusive perspective in Angola: Context, advances and emerging needs (1979-2017)]. Educar Em Revista, 37(e77723), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.77723
Bania, T. A., Gianniki, M., Giannakoudi, S., Charitaki, G., Matzaroglou, C., & Billis, E. (2020). The interaction with disabled persons scale: Evidencing construct validity with factor analysis and measurement invariance in Greek-speaking healthcare students. Disability & Rehabilitation, 43(7), 988–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1850890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1850890
Brown, T., Mu, K., Peyton, C. G., Rodger, S., Stagnitti, K., Hutton, E., Casey, J., Watson, C., Hong, C. S., Huang, Y., & Wu, C. (2009). Occupational therapy students’ attitudes towards individuals with disabilities: A comparison between Australia, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(6), 1541–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.020
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IMB SPSSS statistics. London: Sage.
Forlin, C., Fogarty, G., & Carroll, A. (1999). Validation of the factor structure of the interactions with disabled persons scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539908255334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539908255334
Forlin, C., Jobling, A., & Carroll, A. (2001). Preservice teachers’ discomfort levels toward people with disabilities. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 4, 32–38.
Gaskin, J., James, M., & Lim, J. (2019). Master validity tool, AMOS Plugin.
Gething, L. (1994). The interaction with disabled persons scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9(5), 23–42.
Gething, L. (1993). Attitudes toward people with disabilities of physiotherapists and members of the general population. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 39(4), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60489-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60489-X
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Andreson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Andover: CENGAGE.
Iacono, T., Tracy, J., Keating, J., & Brown, T. (2009). The Interaction with Disabled Persons scale: Revisiting its internal consistency and factor structure, and examining item-level properties. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(6), 1490–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.010
Kauffman, J. M., & Hornby, G. (2020). Inclusive vision versus special education reality. Education Sciences, 10(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090258
Lei da Acessibilidade [Acessibility Act] 2016, nº. 10/16 (Angola), 2016.
https://pt.scribd.com/document/582217691/LEI-n-10-16-27Julho-Lei-Das-Acessibilidades.
Lei da Pessoa com Deficiência [Law of the Person with Disabilities] 2012, nº. 21/12 (Angola), 2012. file:///C:/Users/heloi/Downloads/lei_da_pessoa_com_defici__ncia__persons_with_disabilities_act__-_lei_n.___21_12.pdf
Lobato, R. M., Valenza, M. C., & Ortiz-Rubio, A. (2021). Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale in Spanish population. Disability and Rehabilitation, Sep. 30, 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t87941-000
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1980916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1980916
Loo, R. (2001). A psychometric re-analysis of the interaction with disabled persons scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087146
Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2021). SOLOMON: A method for splitting a sample into equivalent subsamples in factor analysis. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01750-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01750-y
Maclean, D., & Gannon, P. M. (1995). Measuring Attitudes Toward Disability - The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale Revisited. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(4), 791–806.
Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
Myong, Y., Shin, H.-I., Lee, J.-E., Cho, W., & Yi, Y. G. (2021). Development and validation of a new scale to assess attitudes and perspectives toward persons with disabilities. Annals of Rehabillitation Medicine, 45(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.21046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.21046
Sánchez, M. T. P., Chacón-López, H., Cara, M. J. C., & Zambrano, B. V. (2021). Attitudes towards persons with disabilities by educational science students: Importance of contact, its frequency and the type of disability. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 68(5), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1716960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1716960
Tait, K., & Purdie, N. (2000). Attitudes toward disability: Teacher education for inclusive environments in an Australian university. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/103491200116110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/103491200116110
Thomas, A., Palmer, J. K., Coker-Juneau, C. J., & Williams, D. J. (2003). Factor structure and construct validity of the interaction with disabled persons scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(3), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403063003008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403063003008
Thomas, A., Vaughn, E. D., Doyle, A., & Bubb, R. (2014). Implicit association tests of attitudes toward persons with disabilities. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(2), 184–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.813357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.813357
Wallymahmed, A. H., McKay-Moffat, S. F., & Cunningham, C. C. (2007). The interaction with disabled persons scale: A validation with UK midwives. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 35(8), 1049–1059. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.8.1049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.8.1049
Yoshida, M. W., Sonoda, T., & Zemke, R. (2003). Validation of Urdu Interaction with Disabled Persons scale. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 26(3), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200309000-00011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200309000-00011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Educação

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
DERECHOS DE AUTOR
La sumisión de originales para la Educação implica la transferencia, por los autores, de los derechos de publicación. El copyright de los artículos de esta revista es el autor, junto con los derechos de la revista a la primera publicación. Los autores sólo podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicaciones indicando claramente a
Educação como el medio de la publicación original.
CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
Debido a que es una revista de acceso abierto, permite el libre uso de artículos en aplicaciones científicas y educativas, siempre y cuando la fuente. De acuerdo con la Licencia Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0, adoptada por la
Educação el usuario debe respetar los requisitos abajo.
Usted tiene el derecho de:
Compartir - copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
Adaptar - remezcla, transformar y crear a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso con fines comerciales.
Sin embargo, sólo de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
Asignación - Usted debe dar el crédito apropiado, proveer un enlace a la licencia e indicar si los cambios se han hecho. Debe hacerlo en condiciones razonables, pero de ninguna manera que sugiera que
Educação usted o su uso es compatible.
No hay restricciones adicionales - No se pueden aplicar términos legales o naturaleza tecnológica de las medidas que restringen legalmente hacer algo distinto de los permisos de licencia.
Avisos:
Usted no tiene que cumplir con los términos de licencia con respecto a los elementos materiales que son de dominio público o cuyo uso está permitido por una excepción o limitación que se aplica.
Garantías no se les da. La licencia no le puede dar todos los permisos necesarios para el uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos, como derechos de imagen, privacidad o derechos morales, pueden limitar el uso del material.
Para obtener más información acerca de la licencia Creative Commons, siga el enlace en la parte inferior de esta página web.