Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ): new validity evidences and cross-cultural invariance

Authors

  • Evandro Morais Peixoto Universidade de Pernambuco, PE
  • Giovana Corte Honda Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), SP
  • Joel Gagnon Université du Québec à Trois-Rivieres (UQTR), Quebec
  • Tatiana de Cássia Nakano Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUCC), SP
  • Glaucia Mitsuko Ataka da Rocha Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), TO
  • Daniela Sacramento Zanini Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUCG), GO
  • Marcos Alencar Abaide Balbinotti Université du Québec à Trois-Rivieres (UQTR), Quebec

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2019.1.27851

Keywords:

acceptance and commitment therapy-ACT, validity, psychotherapy, Item Response Theory-IRT, cross-cultural psychology.

Abstract

The cognitive fusion is a key concept in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-ACT. It is a mechanism in which the person merges with his/hers thoughts as if they were real. The objectives of this study were to estimate new validity evidences of the Brazilian version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) and to test the items invariance among Brazilian and French-Canadian sample. The sample comprised 578 Brazilian adults and 676 French-Canadian adults. The Exploratory Factor Analysis showed adjustment of the one-dimensional structure, confirming the theoretical hypothesis. The Rating Scale Model showed difficulty indexes between -0, 42 e 0, 69, god fit indexes (Infit/Outfit) between 0,79 e 1,45 to both items versions, as well as summarized description of participants' theta levels. The DIF analysis showed that two items violated the invariance of the difficulty parameter due to cultural clashes. However, it was observed invariance of these parameters when the participants’gender was considered in the analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Evandro Morais Peixoto, Universidade de Pernambuco, PE

Docente do Departamento de Psicologia da Universidade de Pernambuco UPE. Pos doutorando em Psicologia pela Universidade São Franscico. Doutor em psicologia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas -PUCC, com estágio doutoral PDSE/CAPES desenvolvido na Unviersité du Quebéc à Trois-Rivières UQTR (Canadá).

Giovana Corte Honda, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), SP

Docente do departamento de psicologia da Universidade Nove de Julho-UNINOVE. Doutora em psicologia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas PUCAMP

Joel Gagnon, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivieres (UQTR), Quebec

Doutorando em psicologia pela Université du Québec à Trois-Rivieres-UQTR.

Tatiana de Cássia Nakano, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUCC), SP

Docente do curso de pós-graduação stricto sensu em Psicologia da PUC-Campinas. Pós Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade São Francisco e Doutora em Psicologia pela PUC-Campinas

Glaucia Mitsuko Ataka da Rocha, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), TO

Pos doutoranda em psicoloa pela Instituto de Psicoloa da USP. Doutora em Psicologia pela Pntifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas PUCC.

Daniela Sacramento Zanini, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUCG), GO

Docente do departamente de Psicologia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goias PUCG. Pos doutora e doutora pela Universidad de Barcelona (Espanha).

Marcos Alencar Abaide Balbinotti, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivieres (UQTR), Quebec

Docente do departamente de Psicologia da Université du Québec à Trois-Rivieres-UQTR. Pos doutor em psicologia pela Université de Montréal e pela Université de Sherbrooke (Canadá). Doutor em Psicologia pela Université de Montréal.

References

American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychology Association (APA) & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. (DOI INEXISTENTE)

Barbosa, L. M. & Murta, S. G. (2014). Terapia de aceitação e compromisso: história, fundamentos, modelo e evidências. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 16(3), 34-49. doi:10.31505/rbtcc.v16i3.711

Byrne B. M., Shavelson R. J., & Muthén B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. (DOI INEXISTENTE)

Damásio, B., Valentini, F., Núñes-Rodriguez, S., Kliem, S., Koller, S., Hinz, A., & Zenger, M. (2016). Is the General Self-Efficacy Scale a Reliable Measure to be used in Cross-Cultural Studies? Results from Brazil, Germany and Colombia. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, E29. doi:10.1017/sjp.2016.30

Dell’Orco, F., Prevedini, A., Oppo, A., Prestes, G. B., & Moderato, P. (2012). Validation study of the Italian version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ). Poster session presented at ACBS Annual World Conference X, Washington D.C., USA. (DOI INEXISTENTE)

Dionne, F., Gagnon, J., Balbinotti, M., Peixoto, E. M., Martel, M-E, Gillanders, D., & Monestes, J-L. Buying into thoughts: French validation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 48(4), 278-285. doi:10.1037/cbs0000053

Gillanders, D. T., Bolderston, H., Bond, F. W., Dempster, M., Flaxman, P. E., Campbell, L., … Remington, R. (2014) The development and initial validation of The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Behavior Therapy, 45, 83-101. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001

Gonçalves, D. M. & Kapczinski, F. (2008). Transtorno mental, indicadores demográficos e satisfação com a vida. Revista de Saúde Pública, 42(6), 1060-1066. doi:10.1590/S0034-89102008000600012

Gouveia, V. V., Chaves, S. S. S., Oliveira, I. C. P., Dias, M. R., Gouveia, R. S. V., & Andrade, P. R. (2003). A utilização do QSG-12 na população geral: estudo de sua validade de construto. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 19(3), 241-248. doi:10.1590/S0102-37722003000300006

Haeys, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1-25. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006

Hayes, S. C., Pistorello, J., & Biglan, A. (2008). Terapia de aceitação e compromisso: modelo, dados e extensão para a prevenção do suicídio. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 10, 81-104. doi:10.31505/rbtcc.v10i1.234

Hambleton R. K. (2005). Issues, designs and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. (DOI INEXISTENTE)

Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-bad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44, 153-166. doi:10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y

International Test Commission. (2010). International Test Commission Guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Liverpol: International Test Commission. Recuperado de http://www.intestcom.org

Lara, D. & Alexis, S. (2014). ¿Matrices policóricas/tetracóricas o matrices Pearson? Un estudio metodológico. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 6(1), 39-48. (DOI INEXISTENTE)

Linacre J. M. (2015). A user's guide to Winsteps Ministep: Rasch-model computer programs. Recuperado de http://www.winsteps.com

Lorenzo-Seva, U. & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2 A Comprehensive Program for Fitting Exploratory and Semiconfirmatory Factor Analysis and IRT Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497-498. doi:10.1177/0146621613487794

Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2011). The hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 340-364. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.564527

Lucena-Santos, P., Carvalho, S., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Gillanders, D., & Oliveira, M. S. (2017). Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire: Exploring measurement invariance across three groups of Brazilian women and the role of cognitive fusion as a mediator in the relationship between rumination and depression. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6, 53-62. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.02.004

Machado, W. L., Hauck Filho, N., Teixeira, M. A. P., & Bandeira, D. R. (2014). Análise de Teoria de Resposta ao Item de Marcadores Reduzidos da Personalidade. Psico, 45(4), 551-558. doi:10.15448/1980-8623.2014.4.13138

Milfont, T. L. & Fisher, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111-121. doi:10.21500/20112084.857

Romero-Moreno, R., Marquez-Gonzalez, M., Losada, A., Gillanders, D., & Fernandez-Fernandez, V. (2014). Cognitive fusion in dementia caregiving: Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the "Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire". Behavioral Psychology/Psicologia Conductual, 22, 117-132. (DOI INEXISTENTE)

Ruiz, F. J., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., Riaño-Hernandez, D., & Gillanders, D. (2017). Psychometric Properties of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire in Colombia. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 49, 80-87. doi:10.1016/j.rlp.2016.09.006

Sass, D. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 347-363. doi:10.1177/0734282911406661

Silva, B. (2015). Fusão cognitiva com impulso alimentar: análise das propriedades psicométricas de uma nova medida e o seu impacto no comportamento alimentar. (Dissertação de Mestrado).

Recuperado de: https://estudogeral.sib.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/30996/1/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20B%C3%A1rbara%20Leite%20Silva.pdf

Solé, E., Racine, M., Castarlenas, R., de la Vega, R., Tomé-Pires, C., Jensen, M., & Miró, J. (2015). The psychometric properties of the cognitive fusión questionnaire in adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(3), 181-186. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000244

Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics. New Jersey: Pearson.

Timmerman, M. E. & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality Assessment of Ordered Polytomous Items with Parallel Analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209-220. doi:10.1037/a0023353

von Davier A. A. (2011). A statistical perspective on equating test scores. In A. A. Von Davier (Ed.), Statistical models for test equating, scaling, and linking (pp. 1-17). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98138-3

Wei-Chen, Z., Yang, J., Li, X., Hui-Na, G., & Zhuo-Hong, Z. (2014). Reability and validity of the chinese version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 28, 40-44. (DOI INEXISTENTE)

Zanini, D. S. & Peixoto, E. M. (2016). Social Support Scale (MOS-SSS): Analysis of the psychometric properties via item response theory. Paidéia, 26(65), 359-368. doi:10.1590/1982-43272665201612

Zanini, D. S., Mendonça, H., Forns, M., & Kirchner, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of Coping Response Inventory with brazilian adolescents. Psychological Reports, 107, 617-628. doi:10.2466/08.17.20.PR0.107.5.617-628

Downloads

Published

2019-05-08

How to Cite

Peixoto, E. M., Honda, G. C., Gagnon, J., Nakano, T. de C., Rocha, G. M. A. da, Zanini, D. S., & Balbinotti, M. A. A. (2019). Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ): new validity evidences and cross-cultural invariance. Psico, 50(1), e27851. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2019.1.27851

Issue

Vol. 50 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright

The submission of originals to Psico implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Psico as the site of original publication.

Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.