Teacher self-assessment inventory

Proposal of an instrument based on the teacher behaviors checklist

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2021.2.30095

Keywords:

teacher’s characteristics, self assessment scale, higher education

Abstract

This research aims to propose the Teacher Self-Assessment Inventory, a short-version adaptation of the Teacher Behavior Checklist, presenting evidence of its validity and accuracy, as well as its associations with subjective well-being. Participating in this study were 214 university professors, 55.6% female and 44.4% male, with a mean age of the complete sample of 39.21 (SD = 9.77). They answered sociodemographic and occupational questions, the Teacher Self-Assessment Inventory, the Life Satisfaction Scale, and the Job-related affective well-being scale. Parallel and Exploratory Factor Analyzes suggested that the instrument presented evidence of validity, corroborating the two originally observed dimensions, Care and Professionalism, with acceptable precision indices. Care presented correlation with positive affect and Professionalism with the three dimensions of well-being. These results suggest the adequacy of the instrument to this context, as well as possible future research studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Valeschka Martins Guerra, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santos (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brasil

Doutora em Psicologia Social pela University of Kent, em Canterbury, Inglaterra; professora da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), em Vitória, ES, Brasil.

Naiara Ferreira Vieira Castello, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santos (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brasil.

Mestre em Psicologia Institucional pela Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), em Vitória, ES, Brasil

Marcella Bastos Cacciari, Faculdade Multivix São Mateus, São Mateus, ES, Brasil

Mestre em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), em Vitória, ES, Brasil.

Clarisse Lourenço Cintra, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santos (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brasil

Mestre em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), em Vitória, ES, Brasil.

References

Albuquerque, S. S., & Tróccoli, B. T. (2004). Desenvolvimento de uma escala de bem-estar subjetivo. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 20(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722004000200008

Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction. Mplus. https://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf

Buskist, W., Sikorski, J., Buckley, T., & Saville, B. K. (2002). Elements of master teaching. In S. F. Davis & W. Buskist (Eds.), The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 27-39). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://osu.instructure.com/courses/10158/files/2435010/download

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge; Taylor & Francis.

Chaves, M. C., & Pinheiro, M. R. (2015). Boas práticas docentes no ensino superior: uma questão de autoeficácia individual e coletiva. In C. P. Albuquerque, A. L. Oliveira, A. M. Seixas, A. G. Ferreira, C. C. Santos, M. P. Paixão, & R. P. Paixão (Org.), Livro de Atas: O Ensino Superior Pós Bolonha - Tempo de Balanço, Tempo de Mudança (pp. 63-68). Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação.

Chesnut, S. R., & Burley, H. (2015). Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 15, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.001

Damásio, B. F. (2012). Uso da análise fatorial exploratória em psicologia. Avaliação Psicológica, 11(2), 213-228.

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34

Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-241. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.304

Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva U. (2018). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 762-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719308

Ferreira, C. A., & Oliveira, C. (2015). Auto-avaliação docente e melhoria das práticas pedagógicas: percepções de professores portugueses. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, 26(63), 806-836. http://dx.doi.org/10.18222/eae.v0ix.3592

Filz, T., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2013). Student perceptions of undergraduate teaching assistants. Teaching of Psychology, 40(1), 48-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312465864

Gouveia, V. V., Barbosa, G. A., Andrade, E. O., & Carneiro, M. B. (2005). Medindo a satisfação com a vida dos médicos no Brasil. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 54(4), 298-305.

Gouveia, V. V., Fonseca, P. N. D., Lins, S. L. B., Lima, A. V. D., & Gouveia, R. S. (2008). Escala de bem-estar afetivo no trabalho (JAWS): Evidências de validade fatorial e consistência interna. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 21(3), 464-473. https://doi.org/10.1590/S010279722008000300015

Henklain, M. H. O. (2017). Aplicações do Teacher Behavior Checklist à formação de professores de nível superior: contribuições analítico-comportamentais e psicométricas. [Tese de doutorado, Universidade Federal de São Carlos].

Henklain, M. H. O., Carmo, J. S., & Haydu, V. B. (2018). Contribuições analítico-comportamentais para descrever o repertório de professores universitários eficazes. Revista Brasileira de Orientação Profissional, 19(2), 197-207. https://doi.org/1026707/1984-7270/2019v19n2p197

Henklain, M. H. O., Carmo, J. S., Haydu, V. B., & Muniz, M. (2020). Teacher Behavior Checklist Content Validity According to Brazilian Teachers and Undergraduates. Psico-USF, 25(1), 171-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712020250114

Henklain, M. H. O., Carmo, J. S., Haydu, V. B., Muniz, M., Buskist, W., & Keeley, J. W. (2020). Teacher Behavior Checklist: Psychometric Evidence in Teacher Evaluation by Brazilian University Students. Paidéia, 30, e3025. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3025

Henklain, M. H. O., Gerônimo Jr., V. C., Lira, J. R., & Garcia, R. V. B. (2020). Feedback fundamentado no Teacher Behavior Checklist para professores universitários: Uma pesquisa exploratória. Psicologia Argumento, 38(96), 222-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.7213//psicolargum.38.100.AO02

Keeley, J., Christopher, A. N., Buskist, W. (2012). Emerging evidence for excellent teaching across borders. Em J. E. Groccia, M. Al-Sudairy, & W. Buskist (Eds.). Handbook of college and university teaching: Global perspectives (pp. 374-390). Sage.

Keeley, J., Smith, D., Buskist, W. (2006). The Teacher Behaviors Checklist: Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 33(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3302_1

Komarraju, M. (2013). Ideal teacher behaviors: Student motivation and self-efficacy predict preferences. Teaching of Psychology, 40(2), 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312475029

Larson, L. M., Seipel, M. T., Shelley, M. C., Gahn, S. W., Ko, S. Y., Shenkenfelder, M., Rover, D. T., Schmittmann, B., & Heitmann, M. M. (2019). The Academic Environment and Faculty Well-Being: The Role of Psychological Needs. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(1), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717748667

Liu, S., Keeley, J., & Buskist, W. (2014). Chinese college students’ perceptions of characteristics of excellent teachers. Teaching of Psychology, 42(1), 83-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314562684

Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P.J. (2019). Robust Promin: a method for diagonally weighted factor rotation. LIBERABIT, Revista Peruana de Psicología, 25, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n1.08

McGovern, T. & Miller, S. (2008). Integrating teacher behaviors with character strengths and virtues for faculty development. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 278-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802374609

Nassif, V., Hanashiro, D. M., & Torres, R. (2010). Fatores que influenciam na percepção das competências para o exercício da docência. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 15(44), 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782010000200012

Pasquali, L. (2003). Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. Vozes.

Reis, M. L. (2014). Autoavaliação em perspectiva colaborativa para a melhoria da prática docente. [Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade de Brasília].

Schaeffer, G., Epting, K., Zinn, T., & Buskist, W. (2003). Student and faculty perceptions of effective teaching: A successful replication. Teaching of Psychology, 30(2), 133-136.

Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality Assessment of Ordered Polytomous Items with Parallel Analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353

van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for crosscultural research. Sage.

Vieluf, S., Kunter, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Teacher self-efficacy in cross-national perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.006

Published

2021-07-15

How to Cite

Guerra, V. M., Castello, N. F. V., Cacciari, M. B., & Cintra, C. L. (2021). Teacher self-assessment inventory: Proposal of an instrument based on the teacher behaviors checklist. Psico, 52(2), e30095. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2021.2.30095

Issue

Section

Articles