Researching with older people
An experience in participative mapping and world café techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2022.1.38848Keywords:
age-friendly cities, older people, participative mapping, world café, urban spacesAbstract
The multidimensionality of the aging process involves changes in different capacities. The age-friendly cities strategy addressed the need for adaptations in urban spaces that meets the demands of older people’s wellbeing. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore how Participative Mapping and World Café techniques could assist in identifying challenges to the delivery of services and resources to create communities that promote active aging, from the perspectives of older people and stakeholders. The techniques generated co-constructed discussion and shared understandings about the barriers residents face in negotiating and accessing services. Demands associated with the precariousness of local infrastructure, the absence of leisure activities, and a generalized feeling of insecurity in their neighborhoods were recurring themes. The demands led to the conclusion that for healthy aging, the interrelation of objective and subjective factors that take into
Downloads
References
Bardin, L. (2010). Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70.
Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2001). The World Café: Living knowledge through conversations that matter. The Systems Thinker, 12(5), 1-5. https://thesystemsthinker.com/the-world-cafe-living-knowledge-through-conversations-that-matter
Chapin III, F. S., & Knapp, C. N. (2015). Sense of place: A process for identifying and negotiating potentially contested visions of sustainability. Environmental Science and Policy, 53, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.012
Corbett, J. (2009). Good practices in participatory mapping. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
Cozens, P., & Love, T. (2015). A review and current status of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). CPL Bibliography, 30(4), 393-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595440
Fang, M. L., Woolrych, R., Sixsmith, J., Canham, S., Battersby, L., & Sixsmith, A. (2016). Place-Making with older persons: Establishing Sense-of-Place through Participatory Community Mapping Workshops. Social Science & Medicine, 168, 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.007
Fitzgerald, K. G., & Caro, F. G. (2014). An overview of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities around the world. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1-2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.860786
Gondim, S. M. G. (2003). Grupos focais como técnica de investigação qualitativa: desafios metodológicos. Paidéia, 12(24), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2002000300004
Hagestad, G. & Neugarten, B. (1985). Age and the life course. In R. Binstock, R. H., & Shanas, E. (Ed.), Handbook of aging and society (pp. 35-61). van Nostrand- Reinhold.
Handler, S. (2014). An alternative age-friendly handbook. The University of Manchester Library.
Hurley, T. J., & Brown, J. (2009). Conversational leadership: Thinking together for a change. The Systems Thinker, 20(9), 2-7. https://thesystemsthinker.com/conversational-leadership-thinking-together-for-a-change/
Iwarsson, S., Edberg, A-K., Ivanoff, S. D., Hanson, E., Jönson, H., & Schmidt, S. (2019). Understanding user involvement in research in aging and health. Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, 5, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721419897781
Levasseur, M., Dubois, M-F., Généreux, M., Menec, V., Raina, P., Roy, M., Gabaude, C., Couturier, Y., & St-Pierre, C. (2017). Capturing how age-friendly communities foster positive health, social participation and health equity: A study protocol of key components and processes that promote population health in aging Canadians. BMC Public Health, 17(502), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4392-7
Löfqvist, C., Lexell, E. M., Nilsson, M. H., & Iwarsson, S. (2019). Exploration of the research circle methodology for user involvement in research on home and health dynamics in old age. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 33(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2018.1534176
Martin, D., Long, O., & Kessler, L. (2019). Planning for Aging in Place: Incorporating the voice of elders to promote quality of life. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 33(4), 382-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2019.1593280
Nieboer, A. P., & Cramm, J. M. (2017). Age-friendly communities matter for older people’s well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9923-5
O´Sullivan, R. (2018). Research partnerships – embracing user involvement: practical considerations and reflections. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 19(4), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAOA-08-208-0039
Perlaviciute, G. & Steg, L. (2012). Calidad de vida em entornos residenciales. Psyecology, 3(3), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119712802845741
Rémillard-Boilard, S., Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2017). Involving older residents in age-friendly developments: from information to coproduction mechanisms. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309932
Silva, E. A. R., & Elali, G. A. (2015). O papel das praças para o envelhecimento ativo sob o ponto de vista dos especialistas. Pesquisas e Práticas Psicossociais, 10(2), 382-396. http://www.seer.ufsj.edu.br/index.php/revista_ppp/article/view/Ribeiro%20da%20Silva%2C%20Elali
Sixsmith, J., Fan, M. L., Woolrych, R., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., & Sixsmith, A. (2017). Aging well in the right place: Partnership working with older people. Working with Older People, 21, 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-01-2017-0001
Teza, P., Miguez, V. B., Fernandes, R. F., Souza, J. A., Dandolini, G. A., & Abreu, A. F. (2013). Geração de ideias: Aplicação da técnica de World Café. Int. J. Know. Eng. Manag., 3(3), 1-4.
Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. S. (2011). The meaning of “Ageing in Place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098
World Health Organization (2008). Global Age-friendly cities: a guide. WHO.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Psico
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Psico implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Psico as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.