Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de presencia en tecnologías ubicuas

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2020.2.31628

Palabras clave:

autopresencia, presencia espacial, presencia social, tecnologías ubicuas, evaluación psicológica.

Resumen

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo el desarrollo de una escala de presencia en las tecnologías ubicuas. El proceso de desarrollo del instrumento tuvo como etapas 1) la elección de los atributos comportamentales referentes al objeto de estudio y la operacionalización del constructo, 2) la presentación a tres jueces, dos grupos focales, 3) una aplicación piloto en una muestra reducida (n = 30), y por último, 4) una aplicación con 458 participantes. Se realizaron análisis de consistencia interna, análisis factorial confirmatorio y análisis factorial confirmatorio multigrupo. La versión final de la Escala de Presencia en Tecnologías Ubíquicas cuenta con 14 ítems, agrupados en tres factores independientes (Autopresencia, Presencia Espacial y Presencia Social), y presenta un buen índice de consistencia interna (alfa = 0,905) y un índice de ajuste aceptable (χ2 = 116,83; gl = 74; p < 0,01; CFI = 0,99; RMSEA = 0,035; SRMR = 0,053) con parámetros psicométricos equivalentes por género.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Fabiane Schutz, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS.

Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS.

Lívia Maria Bedin, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS.

Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil). Professora do Departamento de Psicologia do Desenvolvimento e da Personalidade e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia de Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) em Porto Alegre, RS.

Jorge Castellá Sarriera, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS.

Doutor em Psicologia pela Universidade Autonoma de Madrid (UAM, Madri, Espanha). Professor do Departamento de Psicologia do Desenvolvimento e da Personalidade e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia e do Programa de Pós-Graduação Política Social e Serviço Social da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) em Porto Alegre, RS.

Citas

Benyon, D. (2012). Presence in blended spaces. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 219-226. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.005

Best, P., Taylor, B., & Manktelow, R. (2015). I’ve 500 friends, but who are my mates? Investigating the influence of online friend networks on adolescent wellbeing. Journal of Public Mental Health, 14(3), 135-148. http://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-05-2014-0022

Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J.(2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480. http://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270

Byrne, B. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Taylor & Francis Group. DOI INEXISTENTE

Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A., (2007). Perceived interactivity leading to e loyalty: Development of a model for cognitive–affective user responses. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 850–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.07.004

Felton, E. (2014). A/Effective connections: Mobility, technology and well-being. Emotion, Space And Society, 13, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2014.09.001

Freeman, J., Lessiter, J., Pugh, K., & Keogh, E. (2005). When presence and emotion are related, and when they are not. Presence 2005: The 8th Annual Workshop on Presence, London. DOI INEXISTENTE

Han, K., Shih, P., Beth Rosson, M., & Carroll, J. (2014). Understanding Local Community Attachment, Engagement and Social Support Networks Mediated by Mobile Technology. Interacting With Computers, 28(3), 220-237. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu040

Harms, C., & A.Biocca, F. (2004). Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds social presence measure. In M. Alcaniz & B. Rey (Eds.), Seventh Annual International Workshop: Presence 2004. Valencia: Universidad Politecnica de Valencia. DOI INEXISTENTE

Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1, 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262

Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44, 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y

Hyun, M., & O'Keefe, R. (2012). Virtual destination image: Testing a telepresence model. Journal Of Business Research, 65(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.011

Ijsselsteijn, W. A. & Riva, G. (2003) Being There: The experience of presence in mediated environments. In: Riva, G., Davide, F., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A., (eds.), Being There - Concepts, Effects and Measurements of User Presence in Synthetic Environments, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 3-16. DOI INEXISTENTE

International Society for Presence Research. (2000). The Concept of Presence: Explication Statement. Retrieved from https://ispr.info/ DOI INEXISTENTE

International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition). [www.InTestCom.org]. DOI INEXISTENTE

International Test Commission (2005). International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet Delivered Testing. [www.intestcom.org]. DOI INEXISTENTE

Kim, D., Frank, M., & Kim, S. (2014). Emotional display behavior in different forms of Computer Mediated Communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.001

Kim, H., Suh, K., & Lee, U. (2013). Effects of collaborative online shopping on shopping experience through social and relational perspectives. Information & Management, 50(4), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.02.003

Lee, E., & Shin, S. (2014). When the Medium Is the Message. Communication Research, 41(8), 1088-1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.02.003

Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, Explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1): 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x

Lee, K., & Nass, C. (2005). Social-Psychological Origins of Feelings of Presence: Creating Social Presence With Machine-Generated Voices. Media Psychology, 7(1), 31-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0701_2

Lowden, R. & Hostetter, C. (2012). Access, utility, imperfection: The impact of videoconferencing on perceptions of social presence. Computers In Human Behavior, 28(2), 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.007

Milfont, T. & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3. 111-130. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857

Nowak, K. (2013). Choosing Buddy Icons that look like me or represent my personality: Using Buddy Icons for social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1456–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.027

Nowak, K. L., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users' sense of telepresence copresence and social presence in virtual environments. Presence, 12, 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761289

Ogara S., Koh C, Prybutok, V.R. (2014). Investigating factors affecting social presence and user satisfaction with Mobile Instant Messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 36. 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.064

Okazaki, S. & Mendez, F. (2013). Perceived Ubiquity in Mobile Services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(2), 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.10.001

Park, E., & Sundar, S. (2015). Can synchronicity and visual modality enhance social presence in mobile messaging? Computers In Human Behavior, 45, 121-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.001

Pasquali, L. (2010). Instrumentação Psicológica: Fundamentos e Práticas. Porto Alegre: Artmed. DOI INEXISTENTE

Ratan, R. (2012). Self-presence, explicated: Body, emotion, and identity extension into the virtual self. In Handbook of Research on Technoself: Identity in a Technological Society (pp. 321-335). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2211-1.ch018

Riva, G. (2009). Is presence a technology issue? Some insights from cognitive sciences. Virtual Reality, 13, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-009-0121-6

Rutledge, P. (2013). The Psychology of Mobile Media. In: P. Bruck & M. Rao (Eds.), Global Mobile: Current Transformations and Futures of Value. Information Today, Inc. DOI INEXISTENTE

Sas, C., & O’Hare, G. M. P. (2003). Presence equation: An investigation into cognitive factors underlying presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761315

Schütz, F. F. (2018). Presença nas tecnologias ubíquas e suas relações com medo de ficar de fora, autoeficácia, apoio social e bem-estar (Doutorado). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. DOI INEXISTENTE

Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1, 120 - 125. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.120

Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons. DOI INEXISTENTE

Silva, G., Donat, J., Rigoli, M., de Oliveira, F., & Kristensen, C. (2016). A questionnaire for measuring presence in virtual environments: factor analysis of the presence questionnaire and adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese. Virtual Reality, 20(4), 237-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0295-7

Stavropoulos, V., Alexandraki, K., & Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2013). Flow and Telepresence contributing to Internet Abuse: Differences according to Gender and Age. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1941-1948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.011

Toufaily, E., Ricard, L., & Perrien, J. (2013). Customer loyalty to a commercial website: Descriptive meta-analysis of the empirical literature and proposal of an integrative model Journal of Business Research, 66, 1436–1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.011

van Baren, J. and Ijsselsteijn, W. (2004). OmniPres Guide and Compendium. [online] International Society for Presence Research. Available at: https://ispr.info/about-presence-2/tools-to-measure-presence/omnipres-guide/ [Accessed 6 Aug. 2018]. DOI INEXISTENTE

Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686

Descargas

Publicado

2020-02-12

Cómo citar

Schutz, F., Bedin, L. M., & Sarriera, J. C. (2020). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de presencia en tecnologías ubicuas. Psico, 51(2), e31628. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2020.2.31628

Número

Vol. 51 Núm. 2 (2020)

Sección

Artículos

Licencia

Derechos de Autor

La sumisión de originales para la Psico implica la transferencia, por los autores, de los derechos de publicación. El copyright de los artículos de esta revista es el autor, junto con los derechos de la revista a la primera publicación. Los autores sólo podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicaciones indicando claramente a Psico como el medio de la publicación original.

Creative Commons License

Excepto donde especificado de modo diferente, se aplican a la materia publicada en este periódico los términos de una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, que permite el uso irrestricto, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio siempre y cuando la publicación original sea correctamente citada.