Hierárquicos, igualitarios y contraditorios: posición social de los adolescentes y orientación para la dominancia social
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2019.4.33939Palabras clave:
dominancia, estructura social, comportamiento social, poder, grupos sociales.Resumen
El estudio evalúa correlaciones entre concepciones jerárquicas de las relaciones entre grupos y las posiciones sociales de estudiantes. El concepto de orientación a la dominancia social (SDO) aborda la aceptación de dominación y jerarquía entre grupos. La encuesta tuvo 663 estudiantes de Uberlandia-MG, con media de 16 años de edad que respondieron un cuestionario con una adaptación de la Escala de SDO y cuestiones referentes a la escolaridad materna, el sexo y la renta familiar. Un análisis de cluster apunta tres patrones: adolescentes que defienden relaciones igualitarias entre los grupos; el patrón opuesto, que aprueba una sociedad con dominantes y dominados; y un posicionamiento contradictorio, que aprueba aspectos igualitarios pero niega que los grupos sean equivalentes. La discusión se centra en los factores sexo y escolaridad y su asociación con la SDO, y en la interpretación del perfil contradictorio que defiende igualdad restringida.
Descargas
Citas
Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. (2014). Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil. Alterações na aplicação do Critério Brasil, válidas a partir de 01/01/2015. Acesso em 26 março 2019 em
http://www.abep.org. https://doi.org/10.11606/d.96.2010.tde-13122010-084622
Aristóteles. (2016). Órganon. 3ª ed. São Paulo: Edipro. Amâncio, L. (2004). Identidade social e relações intergrupais. In J. Vala, M. B. Monteiro (Eds.), Psicologia social (pp. 387-409). Lisboa, Portugal: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Bates, C., & Heaven, P. C. (2001). Attitudes to women in society: The role of social dominance orientation and social values. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 11,43-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.589
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Westport, EUA: Greenwood.
Bourdieu, P. (2002). A dominação masculina (2ª ed.). Rio de Janeiro, BR: Bertrand Brasil.
Buchmann, C. (2002). Measuring family background in international studies of education: conceptual issues and methodological challenges. In A. Porter, A. Gamoran (Ed.), Methodological advances in cross- national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 150-197). Washington, EUA: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10322
Cabral, M. L., & Oliveira, I. (2017). Trauma social em idade avançada. Revista Saúde e Pesquisa, 10(3), 485-492. https://doi.org/10.17765/1983-1870.2017v-10n3p485-492
Carvacho, H., Zick, A., Haye, A., González, R., Manzi, J., Kocik, C., & Bertl, M. (2013). On the relation between social class and prejudice: the roles of education, income, and ideological atitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 272-285. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1961
Cima, R., & Dallago, F. (2007). Existe una correlación negativa entre el autoritarismo de derechas y la orientación a la dominancia social. Psicologia Política, 34, 79-97. (DOI INEXISTENTE)
Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., Roets, A., & Kossowka, M. (2008). Age differences in conservatism: evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 51-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00538.x
Crawley, D., & Suarez, R. (2016). Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant. SAGE Open, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016629185
Cross, J. R., & Fletcher, K. L. (2011). Associations of parental and peer characteristics with adolescents’ social dominance orientation. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 40(6), 694-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9585-7
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 137- 149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458-476). Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
Ekehammar, B., & Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable- and a person- centred approach. European Journal of Personality, 17, 449– 464. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.494
Fernandes, S. C., & Almeida, S. S. (2008). Mensuração e análise dos níveis de orientação à dominância social. Psicologia em Foco, 1(1), 1-7.
Fernandes, S., Costa, J., Camino, L., & Mendoza, R. (2007). Valores psicossociais e orientação à dominância social: Um Estudo Acerca do Preconceito. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 20(3), 490-498. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-79722007000300017
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Nova Iorque, EUA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511810503
Fraser, G., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2015). “We want you in the workplace, but only in a skirt!” Social dominance orientation, gender-based affirmative action and the moderating role of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 73(5), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0515-8
Freeden M. (2015). Liberalism: a very short introduction. Oxford, EUA: Oxford University Press. (DOI INEXISTENTE)
Gatica, L., Martini, J. P., Dreizik, M., & Imhoff, D. (2017). Psychosocial and psycho-political predictors of social inequality justification. Psicología, 35(1), 279-310.
Giger, J., Orgambídez-Ramos, A., Gonçalves, G., Santos, J., & Gomes, A. (2015). Evidências métricas da adaptação da Escala de Dominância Social numa amostra portuguesa. Avaliação Psicológica, 14(1), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2015.1401.16
Gobbi, E., Greguol, M., Barboza Seron, B., & Carraro, A. (2017). Um estudo exploratório da tendência “antiobesidade” entre professores e estudantes de educação física italianos. Movimento, 23(3), 963-974. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.73193
Gouveia, V. V., Vione, K. C., Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2015). Patterns of value change during the life span: some evidence from a functional approach to values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(9), 1276-1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215594189
Gower, J. C. (1971). A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27(4), 857-871. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528823
Heering, M. S., & Leone, L. (2018 – no prelo). Power Moderates the Effects of Social Dominance Orientation on Punishment: An Experimental Analysis. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118755095
Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The Nature of Social Dominance Orientation: Theorizing and Measuring Preferences for Intergroup Inequality Using the New SDO7 Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003-1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
Jetten, J., & Iyer, A. (2010). Different meanings of the social dominance orientation concept: predicting political attitudes over time. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609x435723
Jost, J. & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. (2000). Groupbased dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
Kassambara, A. (2017). Practical guide to cluster analysis in R: unsupervised machine learning. Marseille, Fr: STHDA.
Kassambara, A., & Mundt, F. (2017). factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R package version 1.0.5. Recuperado de https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=factoextra
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: a fundamental decision. Nova Iorque, EUA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5
Lima Nunes, A. V., Pereira, C. R., & Correia, I. (2013). Justice seems not to be for all: exploring the scope of justice. In-Mind, 17(2). Recuperado de http://www.in-mind.org/article/justice-seems-not-to-be-for-all-exploring-the-scope-of-justice
Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., & Hornik, K. (2018). Cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.0.7-1.
Marques, S. C. B. (2016). Vulnerabilidade percebida à doença e movimentos de migração: A crise de refugiados e as suas implicações para o sistema imunitário comportamental (Dissertação de mestrado, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa). Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/13432
McFarland, S. (2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00765.x
Nicol, A. A. M., & France, K. (2016). The Big Five’s relation with the facets of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 320-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.062
O’Brien, K. S., Shovelton, H., & Latner, J. D. (2013). Homophobia in physical education and sport: The role of physical/sporting identity and attributes, authoritarian aggression, and social dominance orientation. International Journal of Psychology, 48(5), 891–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.713107
Pires, A. M. L. T. (2010). El prejuicio racial en Brasil: medidas comparativas. Psicologia & Sociedade, 22(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-71822010000100005
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stalworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientatio: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Acesso em 26 de março de 2019, recuperado de: https://www.R-project.org/.
Santos, M. H., & Amâncio, L. (2014). Percepção de justiça, discriminação e sexismo. Psicologia, 28(1), 63-76.
Sibley, C. G., Duckitt, J. (2010). The ideological legitimation of the status quo: Longitudinal tests of a social dominance model. Political Psychology, 31, 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00747.x
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, C. M., & Pratto, F. (2001). Legitimising ideologies: A social dominance approach. In Jost J. T., & Major B. (Eds.), The Psychology of Legitimacy (pp. 307-331). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, antiegalitarianism, and the political psychology of gender: An extension and crosscultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(200001/02)30:1%-3C41::aid-ejsp976%3E3.0.co;2-o
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1996). Consensual social dominance orientation and its correlates within the hierarchical structure of American society. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 385-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(96)00025-9
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, EUA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139175043
Sidanius, J., Sinclair, S., & Pratto, F. (2006). Social dominance orientation, gender, and increasing educational exposure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1640-1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00074.x
Sirbu, A. (2017). Empatia, Personalidade e Imagens Sociais sobre Jovens em Acolhimento Residencial: o papel mediador da Dominância Social (Dissertação de mestrado, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa). Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/15296
Torres, A. R. R., & Camino, L. (2013). Grupos sociais, relações intergrupais e identidade social. In L. Camino, A. R. R. Torres, M. E. O. Lima, & M. E. Pereira (Eds.), Psicologia social: temas e teorias (pp. 513-537). Brasília, BR: Technopolitik.
Thomas, K. J., & Napolitano, P. H. (2017). Educational privilege: the role of school context in the development of just world beliefs among Brazilian adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 52, 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12382
Vala, J., & Lopes, R. C. (2016). Categorização social e fatores ideológicos na dinâmica das relações intergrupais. In França, D. X. & Lima M. E. O. (Eds), Níveis de análise e formas de intervenção em psicologia social (pp. 43-73). São Paulo, BR: Scortecci
Valencia-Moya, J. (2018). Orientación a la dominancia social de las élites en Chile. Interciencia: Revista de ciencia y tecnología de América, 43(5), 372-378.
Wachelke, J. (2017). Ideologia nas opiniões de estudantes de ensino médio sobre sucesso no trabalho. Psicologia Ciência e Profissão, 37(3), 652-668. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3703004062016
Wachelke, J. (2018a). Posição social de adolescentes e a crença no mundo justo. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 70(2), 65-80.
Wachelke, J. (2018b). Avaliação de adolescentes sobre a importância de valores para a sociedade: relações com classe econômica e escolaridade dos pais. Psychologica, 61(2), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_61-2_3
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de Autor
La sumisión de originales para la Psico implica la transferencia, por los autores, de los derechos de publicación. El copyright de los artículos de esta revista es el autor, junto con los derechos de la revista a la primera publicación. Los autores sólo podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicaciones indicando claramente a Psico como el medio de la publicación original.
Creative Commons License
Excepto donde especificado de modo diferente, se aplican a la materia publicada en este periódico los términos de una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, que permite el uso irrestricto, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio siempre y cuando la publicación original sea correctamente citada.
