Violence and legitimacy
critical analysis of “systemic violence” in Theodor Adorno and Marx Horkheimer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2025.1.44138Keywords:
The Frankfurt School, Systemic violence, Authoritarianism, Instrumental reasonAbstract
Systemic violence consists of aggressive treatment perpetually and subtly inflicted on individuals by individuals or groups. Such violence negatively affects the development of different social spheres. Since systemic violence is the result of rational planning, it is not perceived in its complexity either by those affected or by external agents. The purpose of the text is to discuss the reasons why this type of violence remains implicit. To this end, we will first discuss systemic violence and its types. In a second moment it will be argued that the reasons why this type of violence appears are due to the continued exercise of "instrumental reason" and "authoritarianism" (under the perspective of Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer). And, finally, it will be reviewed whether such analysis serves to understand the reasons for the occurrence of both types of systemic violence or only one of them.
Downloads
References
Adorno, Theodor, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel Levinson, y Nevitt Sanford. 1965. La personalidad autoritaria. Editorial Proyección.
Adorno, Theodor, y Max Horkheimer. 1966. Sociológica. Taurus.
Adorno, Theodor, y Max Horkheimer. 1998. Dialéctica de la Ilustración. Trotta.
Adorno, Theodor. 2005. Dialéctica Negativa. Akal.
Adorno, Theodor. 2009. Crítica de la cultura y sociedad II. Akal.
Almanza Loaiza, Tulia. 2020. Dialéctica negativa y sufrimiento en la filosofía moral de Theodor W. Adorno. Cuadernos de Filosofía Latinoamericana 41 (123): 51-76. https://doi.org/10.15332/25005375/5990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/25005375/5990
Arendt, Hannah. 1973. The origins of totalitarianism. Harvest Books.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2017. Modernidad y holocausto. Ediciones Sequitur.
Bocchiaro, Piero, y Philip Zimbardo. 2017. On the dynamics of disobedience: experimental investigations of defying unjust authority. Psychology research and behavior management, (10): 219-29. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S135094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S135094
Habermas, Jürgen. 1999. Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Taurus.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2009. Ciencia y técnica como ideología. Técnos.
Hilberg, Raul. 2003. The destruction of the european jews. Vol. 3. Yale University Press.
Honneth, Axel. 2007. Reificación: un estudio en la teoría del reconocimiento. Katz.
Horkheimer, Max. 2009. Razón y autoconservación. En teoría tradicional y teoría crítica. Paidós.
Horkheimer, Max. 2010. Crítica de la razón instrumental. Trotta.
Kelman, Herbert. 1973. Violence without moral restraint: reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Journal of Social 29 (4): 25-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00102.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00102.x
Kuhl, Stefan. 2007. Welcome to the club. The discussion about the organizational character of the deportation experiment, the soda cracker experiment, the Stanford prison experiment and the Milgram experiment. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 36 (4): 313-9. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2007-0405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2007-0405
Levi, Primo. 2002. Si esto es ser hombre. Munchick Editores.
Lohmann, Georg. 1993. The failure of self-realization: an interpretation of Horkheimer’s eclipse of reason. En On Max Horkheimer. New perspectives, editado por Seyla Benhabib y John McCole. The Mit Press.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1993. El hombre unidimensional. Planeta-De Agostini.
Milgram Stanley. 1963. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (67): 371-8. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
Rodríguez Jiménez, José Luis. 2006. De la vieja a la nueva extrema derecha (pasando por la fascinación por el fascismo). Historia Actual Online 9: 87-99. https://doi.org/10.36132/hao.v0i9.138.
Shaw, Brian. 1985. Reason, nostalgia, and eschatology in the Critical Theory of Max Horkheimer. The Journal of Politics 47 (1): 160-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2131070
Stirk, Peter. 1992. Max Horkheimer: a new interpretation. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Weber, Max. 2014. Economía y sociedad. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Civitas: journal of Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.