Examining How Projections About the Future of Society Are Related to Present-Day Climate Change Action
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2014.3.17336Keywords:
Climate change, future thinking, environmental citizenship, collective futures.Abstract
Global climate change will affect all domains of person-environment relations. Tackling climate change will require social change that can be motivated by people’s imaginings of the future of their society where such social change has occurred. We use the “collective futures” framework to examine whether beliefs about the future of society are related to present-day intentions to take climate change action. Participants from two Brazilian samples imagined their society in 2050 where climate change was mitigated and then rated how this future society would differ from Brazilian society today in terms of societal-level dysfunction and development and personal-level traits and values. To the extent that participants believed preventing climate change would result in societal development and more competence traits, they were more willing to engage in environmental citizenship activities. Individual differences in future time perspective also impacted environmental citizenship intention. Societal development and consideration of future consequences seem to be distinct routes by which future thinking influence climate change action.Downloads
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and
interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Arnocky, S., Milfont, T. L., & Nicol, J. (2014). Time perspective
and sustainable behaviour: Evidence for the distinction
between consideration of immediate and future consequences.
Environment and Behavior, 46, 556-582. doi: http://dx.doi.
org/10.1177/0013916512474987
Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R., & Jeffries, C. (2012).
Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Climate Change, 2, 600-603. doi: http://dx.doi.
org/10.1038/nclimate1532
Bain, P. G., Horney, M. J., Bongiorno, R., Kashima, Y., & Crimston,
D. (2013). Collective futures: How projections about the future
of society are related to actions and attitudes supporting social
change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 523-
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167213478200
Chomsky, N. (1970/1999). Language and freedom. Resonance, 4,
-104. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02838732
Clayton, S. (2012) (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.001.0001
Dumitru, A., & García-Mira, R. (2012). Creating visions of the
future. Bulletin of People-Environment Studies, 38, 18-20.
Evans, L., Milfont, T. L., & Lawrence, J. (2014). Considering
local adaptation increases willingness to mitigate. Global
Environmental Change, 25, 69-75. doi: http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.013
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model
of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth
respectively follow from perceived status and competition.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
Gouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., & Guerra, V. M. (2014). Functional
theory of human values: Testing its content and structure
hypotheses. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 41-47.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.012
Gifford, R. (2008). Toward a comprehensive model of social
dilemmas. In A. Biel, D. Eek, T. Gärling & M. Gustafsson (Eds.).
New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas. New
York: Springer.
Gifford, R. (2009). Environmental psychology: Manifold visions,
unity of purpose. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 387-
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.002
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162,
-1248.
IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013).
Summary for Policymakers. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K.
Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y.
Xia, V. Bex and P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Climate change 2013:
The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I
to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012).
Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people
exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor
consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1272-1287. doi: http://dx.doi.
org/10.1177/0146167212449362
Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2004). Who
cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye
toward the future. Environment and Behavior, 36, 187-206. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251476
Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005).
Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding
the relations between judgments of competence and warmth.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue:
The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability)
in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249. doi: http://dx.doi.
org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
Milfont, T. L. (2010). Global warming, climate change and human
psychology. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. H. García-Cadena & M.
Frías-Arment (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability:
Current trends in theory, research and practice (pp. 19-42). New
York: Nova Science.
Milfont, T. L. (2012). The interplay between knowledge, perceived
efficacy and concern about global warming and climate change:
A one-year longitudinal study. Risk Analysis, 32, 1003-1020.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01800.x
Milfont, T. L. & Demarque, C. (forthcoming). Understanding
environmental issues with temporal lenses: Issues of temporality
and individual differences. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine & W.
van Beek (Eds.). Time perspective: Theory, research and application.
Essays in honor of Philip Zimbardo. New York: Springer.
Milfont, T. L., Evans, L., Sibley, C. G., Ries, J., & Cunningham,
A. (2014). Proximity to coast is linked to climate change belief.
PLoS ONE, 9, e103180. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0103180.
Milfont, T. L. & Gouveia, V. V. (2006). Time perspective and
values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental
attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 72-82. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.001
Milfont, T. L. & Sibley, C. G. (2011). Exploring the concept of
environmental generativity. International Journal of Hispanic
Psychology, 4, 21-30.
Milfont, T. L., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Testing the
moderating role of the components of norm activation on the
relationship between values and environmental behaviour.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 124-131. doi: http://
dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022109350506
Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. K. C. (2012). Time perspective
and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International
Journal of Psychology, 47, 325-334. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1
/00207594.2011.647029
Morselli, D. (2013). The olive tree effect: Future time perspective
when the future is uncertain. Culture and Society, 19, 305-322.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13489319
Pinheiro, J. Q. (2003). Psicologia ambiental: Espaços construídos,
problemas ambientais, sustentabilidade. Estudos de Psicologia,
, 209-213.
Reicher, S. & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and nation: Categorization,
contestation and mobilization. London, England: SAGE.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure
of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20
countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social
psychology (Vol. 2; pp. 1-65.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999).
A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The
case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-97.
Suddendorf, T. (2006). Foresight and evolution of the human mind.
Science, 312, 1006-1007.
Swim, J. K., Stern, P. C., Doherty, T. J., Clayton, S., Reser, J. P.,
Weber, E. U., Gifford, R., & Howard, G. S. (2011). Psychology’s
contributions to understanding and addressing global climate
change. American Psychologist, 66, 241-250. doi: http://dx.doi.
org/10.1037/a0023220
Urbina-Soria, J., Moyano-Díaz, E. (2012). Environmental psychology
in Latin America. In L. Steg, A. van den Berg, & J. I. M. de Groot (Eds.). Environmental psychology: An introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Uzzell D., & Moser, G. (2009). Introduction: Environmental
psychology on the move. Journal of Environmental Psychology,
, 307-308. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.
003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Psico implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Psico as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.
