“All or nothing”

Extreme responding, dichotomous thinking, and the dark triad of personality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2021.1.35441

Keywords:

test construction, cognitive processes, psychological testing

Abstract

In the current study, we investigated the unique associations between dichotomous thinking, extreme response style (ERS), and the Dark Triad of personality, namely, Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy. We hypothesized that dichotomous thinking would exhibit a positive effect on ERS, and that dichotomous thinking would be positively associated with the Dark Triad even after accounting for ERS. Participants were 488 adults with a mean age of 29.54 years (SD = 10.38). Results confirmed dichotomous thinking positively predicts ERS, that the relationship between dichotomous thinking and the Dark Triad domains remains positive and significant even after accounting for ERS. Moreover, ERS manifested weak negative associations with the Dark Triad, with a significant relationship only with psychopathy. Findings from the current study help expand the understanding of both the substantive nature of response styles and the cognitive processes underlying the Dark Triad of personality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Bruno Bonfá-Araujo, Universidade São Francisco (USF), Campinas, SP, Brasil

Doutorando e mestre em Psicologia pela Universidade São Francisco (USF), em Campinas, SP, Brasil.

Nelson Hauck Filho, Universidade São Francisco (USF), Campinas, SP, Brasil.

Doutor em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), em Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil; professor no Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Psicologia da Universidade São Francisco (USF), em Campinas, SP, Brasil.

References

Anderson, J., & Cheers, C. (2018). Does the Dark Triad predict prejudice?: The role of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism in explaining negativity toward asylum seekers. Australian Psychologist, 53(3), 271 281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12283

Batchelor, J. H., & Miao, C. (2016). Extreme response style: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 16(2), 51-62. https://articlegateway.com/index.php/JOP/article/view/1790

Berlin, S. B. (1990). Dichotomous and complex thinking. Social Service Review, 64(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/jstor.org/stable/30012066

Bonfá-Araujo, B., Oshio, A., & Hauck-Filho, N. (2021). Seeing things in black-and-white: A scoping review on dichotomous thinking style. Japanese Psychological Research, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12328

Costa, A. R. L., & Hauck Filho, N. (2019). Methods for the control of extreme response style in self-report instruments: A review. Trends in Psychology, 27(2), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.2-02

Costa, A. R. L., & Hauck Filho, N. (2017). Menos desejabilidade social é mais desejável: neutralização de instrumentos avaliativos de personalidade. Interação em Psicologia, 21(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.5380/psi.v21i3.53054

Duspara, B., & Greitemeyer, T. (2017). The impact of Dark Tetrad traits on political orientation and extremism: An analysis in the course of a presidential election. Heliyon, 3(10), e00425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00425

Greenleaf, E. A. (1992). Measuring extreme response style. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(3), 328-351. https://doi.org/10.1086/269326

Harzing, A.-W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2), 243-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595806066332

He, J., Bartram, D., Inceoglu, I., & Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Response styles and personality traits: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(7), 1028-1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114534773

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jonason, P. K., Oshio, A., Shimotsukasa, T., Mieda, T., Csathó, A., Sitnikova, M. (2018). Seeing the world in black or white: The dark triad traits and dichotomous thinking. Personality and Individual Differences. 120(1), 102-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.030

Jonason, P. K., Underhill, D., & Navarrate, C. D. (2020). Understanding prejudice in terms of approach tendencies: The Dark Triad traits, sex differences, and political personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 153, 109617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109617

Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105

Koehn, M. A., Okan, C., & Jonason, P. K. (2018). A primer on the dark triad traits. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12198

Oshio, A. (2009). Development and validation of the Dichotomous Thinking Inventory. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(6), 729-742. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.6.729

Oshio, A. (2012). An all-or-nothing thinking turns into darkness: Relations between dichotomous thinking and personality disorders. Japanese Psychological Research, 54(4), 424-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14685884.2012.00515.x

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563. http://doi.org/10.1016/S009-6566(02)00505-6

Revelle, W., & Revelle, M. (2015). Package ‘psych.’ In The Comprehensive R Archive Network.

Vaerenbergh, Y. V., & Thomas, T. D. (2012). Response styles in survey research: A literature review of antecedents, consequences, and remedies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(2), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edso21

Wetzel, E., Lüdtke, O., Zettler, I., & Böhnke, J. R. (2015). The stability of extreme response style and acquiescence over 8 years. Assessment. 23(3), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115583714

Ziegler, M. (2015). “F**k you, I won’t do what you told me!” – Response biases as threats to psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31(3), 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1027/10155759/a0002

Downloads

Published

2021-06-14

How to Cite

Bonfá-Araujo, B., & Hauck Filho, N. (2021). “All or nothing”: Extreme responding, dichotomous thinking, and the dark triad of personality. Psico, 52(1), e35441. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2021.1.35441

Issue

Vol. 52 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Psico

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The submission of originals to Psico implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Psico as the site of original publication.

Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.