Differential Item Functioning Analysis on the Big Five Inventory-2 with Brazilian Adults

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2024.41218

Keywords:

personality, assessement, older adult

Abstract

Many instruments are available for assessing the Big Five Factors of personality. However, possible limitations to these tools can be highlighted in the assessment of older adults. In this study, we verified the presence of response bias (DIF) in the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) due to the respondent's age. A total of 808 adults aged between 17 and 93 years old (M=33.08, SD=19.46) answered the BFI-2. Fifteen items of the BFI-2 were identified with DIF, nine regarding Conscientiousness, four regarding Agreeableness, and two of Neuroticism. We observed a balanced amount of DIF in the BFI-2, either favoring younger people or older people. The items functioned similarly for people under 40 years old and over 60 years old, suggesting justice in assessing respondents' personalities in different life cycle stages. Despite this, some items deserve care during interpretation when answered by older people, and others would benefit from future revision of their wording.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jeferson Gervasio Pires, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

PhD in Psychology from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil; with a postdoctoral internship in Psychology from UFSC, in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. Professor in the Psychology Course at Anhanguera College in São José, SC, Brazil.

Carlos Henrique Sancineto da Silva Nunes, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

PhD in Psychology from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), in Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; with a post-doctorate in Psychology from the University of São Francisco, in Itatiba, SP, Brazil. Associate Professor at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

Maiana Farias Oliveira Nunes, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

PhD in Psychology from the University of São Francisco (USF), in Itatiba, SP, Brazil; with a post-doctorate in Psychology from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), in Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Adjunct Professor at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

References

American Psychological Association. (2014). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Older Adults. American Psychologist, 69(1), 34-65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035063

Chapman, B. P., Benedict, R. H., Lin, F., Roy, S., R., Federoff, H. J., & Mapstone, M. (2017). Personality and Performance in Specific Neurocognitive Domains Among Older Persons. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25(8), 900-908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2017.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2017.03.006

Graham, E. K., & Lachman, M. E. (2012). Personality stability is associated with better cognitive performance in adulthood: Are the stable more able? The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 67, 545-554. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr149

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2018). Projeções e estimativas da população do Brasil e das Unidades da Federação. Estudos e pesquisas. https://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/populacao/projecao

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). Guilford Press. http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~johnlab/2008chapter.pdf

Jokela, M., Pulkki-Råback, L., Elovainio, M., & Kivimäki, M. (2014). Personality traits as risk factors for stroke and coronary heart disease mortality: Pooled analysis of three cohort studies. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37(5), 881-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-013-9548-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-013-9548-z

Karami, H. (2012). An Introduction to Differential Item Functioning. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 11(2), 59-75. http://www.academia.edu/1030760/An_introduction_to_Differential_Item_Functioning

Kaup, A. R., Harmell, A. L., Yaffe, K. (2019). Conscientiousness is associated with lower risk of dementia among Black and White older adults. Neuroepidemiology, 52, 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000492821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000492821

Linacre, J. M. (2010). Winsteps (Version 3.70.02) [Computer Software]. Winsteps.com

Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1194-1218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026913

McAdams, D. P., & Olson, B. D. (2010). Personality development: Continuity and change over the life course. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 517-542. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507

Nye, C. D., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). A Neo-Socioanalytic Model of Personality Development. Work Across the Lifespan, 47-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812756-8.00003-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812756-8.00003-7

Pires, J. G., Nunes, C. H. S. S., & Nunes, M. F. O. (2019). Avaliação da personalidade e o Modelo dos cinco Grandes Fatores. In Baptista, M. N., Muniz, M., Reppold, C. T., Nunes, C. H. S. S., Carvalho, L. F., Primi, R., Noronha, A. P. P., Seabra, A. G., Wechsler, S. M., Hutz, C. S., & Pasquali, L., (Org). Compêndio de Avaliação Psicológica (pp. 494-506). Editora Vozes.

Pires, J. G., Nunes, C. H. S. S., Nunes, M. F. O., Primi, R. (in press). Preliminary validity for the Big Five Inventory-2 in Brazilian adults. PsicoUSF.

Penfield, R. D., & Algina, J. (2006). A generalized DIF effect variance estimator for measuring unsigned differential test functioning in mixed format tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(4), 295-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00018.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00018.x

Roberts, B. W., & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality Trait Change in Adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1): 31-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x

Rossi, G., Van den Broeck, J., Dierckx, E., Segal, D. L., & Van Alphen, S. P. J. (2014). Personality assessment among older adults: the value of personality questionnaires unraveled. Aging & Mental Health, 18(8), 936-940. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.924089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.924089

Soto, C. J. (2019). How Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711-727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831612

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P (2017). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory-2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-X. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004

Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 862-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024950

Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., Damian, R. I., Luchetti, M., Strickhouser, J. E., & Terracciano, A. (2019). Five-factor model personality traits and verbal fluency in 10 cohorts. Psychology and Aging, 34(3), 362-373. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000351

Tautvydaitė, D., Antonietti, J. P., Henry, H., von Gunten, A., & Popp, J. (2017). Relations between personality changes and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease pathology. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 90, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.12.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.12.024

Teresi, J. A. (2006). Different Approaches to Differential Item Functioning in Health Applications: Advantages, Disadvantages and Some Neglected Topics. Medical Care, 44(11), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245142.74628.ab DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245142.74628.ab

Van den Broeck, J., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., & De Clercq, B. (2012). Age-neutrality of the NEO-PI-R: Potential Differential Item Functioning in Older Versus Younger Adults. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34(3), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9287-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9287-4

Yoneda, T., Graham, El., Lozinski, T., Bennett, D. A., Mroczek, D., Piccinin, A. M., Hofer, S. M., & Muniz-Terrera, G. (2022). Personality Traits, Cognitive Status, and Mortality in Older Adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(2), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000418

Downloads

Published

2024-10-11

How to Cite

Pires, J. G., Nunes, C. H. S. da S., & Nunes, M. F. O. (2024). Differential Item Functioning Analysis on the Big Five Inventory-2 with Brazilian Adults. Psico, 55(1), e41218. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2024.41218