Análisis del funcionamiento diferencial en el Big Five Inventory-2 en Brasilenos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2024.41218Palabras clave:
personalidad, avaliación, mayoresResumen
Hay varios instrumentos disponibles para la evaluación de los Cinco Grandes Rasgos de personalidad. Sin embargo, algunas limitaciones en estas herramientas pueden destacarse en la evaluación de los mayores. En este estudio, verificamos la presencia de sesgo de respuesta (DIF) en el Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) debido a la edad del encuestado. Los participantes fueron 808 adultos, de entre 17 y 93 años (M=33,08, SD=19,46), que respondieron al BFI-2. Se identificaron 15 ítems con DIF, nueve se refieren al rasgo Conscienciosidade, cuatro al Amabilidad, y dos de Neuroticismo. Cinco ítems en favor de los encuestados mayores de 60 años, y cuatro ítems que favorecen a los menores de 40 años. Sin embargo, el BFI-2 demostró ser un instrumento justo para evaluar a las personas de diferentes grupos de edad, aunque algunos ítems merecen cuidado en la interpretación cuando contestados por personas mayores, y otros ítems podrán ser revisados en estudios futuros.
Descargas
Citas
American Psychological Association. (2014). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Older Adults. American Psychologist, 69(1), 34-65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035063
Chapman, B. P., Benedict, R. H., Lin, F., Roy, S., R., Federoff, H. J., & Mapstone, M. (2017). Personality and Performance in Specific Neurocognitive Domains Among Older Persons. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25(8), 900-908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2017.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2017.03.006
Graham, E. K., & Lachman, M. E. (2012). Personality stability is associated with better cognitive performance in adulthood: Are the stable more able? The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 67, 545-554. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr149
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2018). Projeções e estimativas da população do Brasil e das Unidades da Federação. Estudos e pesquisas. https://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/populacao/projecao
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). Guilford Press. http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~johnlab/2008chapter.pdf
Jokela, M., Pulkki-Råback, L., Elovainio, M., & Kivimäki, M. (2014). Personality traits as risk factors for stroke and coronary heart disease mortality: Pooled analysis of three cohort studies. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37(5), 881-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-013-9548-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-013-9548-z
Karami, H. (2012). An Introduction to Differential Item Functioning. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 11(2), 59-75. http://www.academia.edu/1030760/An_introduction_to_Differential_Item_Functioning
Kaup, A. R., Harmell, A. L., Yaffe, K. (2019). Conscientiousness is associated with lower risk of dementia among Black and White older adults. Neuroepidemiology, 52, 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000492821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000492821
Linacre, J. M. (2010). Winsteps (Version 3.70.02) [Computer Software]. Winsteps.com
Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1194-1218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026913
McAdams, D. P., & Olson, B. D. (2010). Personality development: Continuity and change over the life course. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 517-542. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507
Nye, C. D., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). A Neo-Socioanalytic Model of Personality Development. Work Across the Lifespan, 47-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812756-8.00003-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812756-8.00003-7
Pires, J. G., Nunes, C. H. S. S., & Nunes, M. F. O. (2019). Avaliação da personalidade e o Modelo dos cinco Grandes Fatores. In Baptista, M. N., Muniz, M., Reppold, C. T., Nunes, C. H. S. S., Carvalho, L. F., Primi, R., Noronha, A. P. P., Seabra, A. G., Wechsler, S. M., Hutz, C. S., & Pasquali, L., (Org). Compêndio de Avaliação Psicológica (pp. 494-506). Editora Vozes.
Pires, J. G., Nunes, C. H. S. S., Nunes, M. F. O., Primi, R. (in press). Preliminary validity for the Big Five Inventory-2 in Brazilian adults. PsicoUSF.
Penfield, R. D., & Algina, J. (2006). A generalized DIF effect variance estimator for measuring unsigned differential test functioning in mixed format tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(4), 295-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00018.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00018.x
Roberts, B. W., & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality Trait Change in Adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1): 31-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x
Rossi, G., Van den Broeck, J., Dierckx, E., Segal, D. L., & Van Alphen, S. P. J. (2014). Personality assessment among older adults: the value of personality questionnaires unraveled. Aging & Mental Health, 18(8), 936-940. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.924089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.924089
Soto, C. J. (2019). How Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711-727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831612
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P (2017). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory-2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-X. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004
Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 862-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024950
Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., Damian, R. I., Luchetti, M., Strickhouser, J. E., & Terracciano, A. (2019). Five-factor model personality traits and verbal fluency in 10 cohorts. Psychology and Aging, 34(3), 362-373. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000351
Tautvydaitė, D., Antonietti, J. P., Henry, H., von Gunten, A., & Popp, J. (2017). Relations between personality changes and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease pathology. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 90, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.12.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.12.024
Teresi, J. A. (2006). Different Approaches to Differential Item Functioning in Health Applications: Advantages, Disadvantages and Some Neglected Topics. Medical Care, 44(11), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245142.74628.ab DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245142.74628.ab
Van den Broeck, J., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., & De Clercq, B. (2012). Age-neutrality of the NEO-PI-R: Potential Differential Item Functioning in Older Versus Younger Adults. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34(3), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9287-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9287-4
Yoneda, T., Graham, El., Lozinski, T., Bennett, D. A., Mroczek, D., Piccinin, A. M., Hofer, S. M., & Muniz-Terrera, G. (2022). Personality Traits, Cognitive Status, and Mortality in Older Adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(2), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000418
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Psico
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
